It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Face the Nation: Kashkari, Vinograd, Gates
Missed the second half of the show? The latest on...Neel Kashkari, the Minneapolis Federal Reserve president, tells "Face the Nation" that "it's certainly possible" unemployment will continue to tick up and there will be some economic "cooling" over the next few weeks", CBS News contributor Sam Vinograd, an Obama administration Homeland Security official, tells "Face the Nation" that she is "less concerned" about the terrorism threat from people coming through the border than "a bad actor who...
Arguments
  Considerate: 93%  
  Substantial: 25%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 63%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.24  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: different thngs    results   opprotunity    
  Relevant (Beta): 92%  
  Learn More About Debra
If we do away with all legal discrimination and, over time, stop worrying about genders whatsoever, then the outcome is unclear, and that will likely depend on the intricacies of biological differences between genders. If we do not, then there will never be equality of outcome. Granted, lack of equality of outcome does not necessarily mean that one gender will be better off than another gender - but the genders will have different outcomes all the same.
If there is 10 times as many male jazz guitarists as there is female jazz guitarists, then it is inequality of outcome. Does it mean that females are worse off as a result? No, as they a) might be less interested in playing jazz guitar in the first place, and b) may dominate in some other areas, say, babysitting.
This is one of the main concerns I have with the term "equality" in itself: it is inherently reductionist. There must be inequality in a thriving society, as different people have different preferences - but "inequality" as it is defined implies that someone gets a better deal than someone else. While in actuality, two people not being equal does not mean one person being better than another person. A blue-eyed human is not equal to a green-eyed human, and a professional tennis player is not equal to a professional basketball player. This is a good inequality, and we sometimes call it diversity - yet in the modern political language these terms are seen as mutually contradictory.
We need a better word for the property we are describing. "Equality" is a misleading term.
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 94%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.06  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 76%  
  Learn More About Debra